Singaporean Beautician Jailed for Botched Eyelid Procedure: Understanding the Legal Ramifications
A shocking incident unfolded in Singapore as a beautician found herself behind bars for three weeks after performing a double eyelid procedure on a patient, despite lacking the proper medical qualifications. The consequences of this illegal action have left both the beautician and her patient grappling with the aftermath of a cosmetic procedure gone wrong.
The patient, a 25-year-old woman, sought out the services of Liu Chengjun, 56, in hopes of enhancing her existing double eyelids. Little did she know that this decision would lead to a nightmare scenario that would leave her with a drooping left eyelid and a slew of medical complications.
Deceptive Practices Unveiled
Liu, operating out of her home, offered a range of beauty treatments that ultimately landed her in hot water. When the patient and her mother inquired about the double eyelid procedure, Liu assured them of her expertise and showcased “before and after” photos of supposed successful outcomes. Despite lacking the necessary credentials, Liu proceeded with the procedure, injecting anaesthetic and threading the eyelids in a bid to create the desired effect.
A Painful Fallout
Following the botched procedure, the patient experienced severe swelling and asymmetry in her eyelids, prompting her to seek medical intervention. Despite attempts to rectify the situation by removing the threads, the damage had been done. Consulting with multiple doctors, including plastic surgeons, revealed the extent of the harm caused by Liu’s actions. The patient now faces the daunting prospect of costly corrective surgery to address the irreversible damage inflicted upon her.
Legal Battle and Sentencing
The Ministry of Health stepped in upon receiving reports of Liu’s misconduct, leading to a thorough investigation that uncovered a history of unlicensed practices. Prosecutor Jason Nim argued for a harsher sentence, emphasizing the emotional toll suffered by the patient due to the altered appearance inflicted by Liu. In defense, Ashvin Hariharan highlighted Liu’s lack of malicious intent and ignorance regarding the need for a medical license, painting the incident as a cosmetic misstep rather than a deliberate act of harm.
As the saga unfolds in the courtroom, the repercussions of this illegal procedure serve as a stark reminder of the risks associated with unregulated cosmetic practices. The case of Liu Chengjun serves as a cautionary tale, shedding light on the importance of seeking qualified professionals for any medical or aesthetic procedures to avoid potential harm and legal consequences.