Singapore Objects to New York Times ‘Tyranny’ Video with Li Shengwu
Singapore has taken issue with a recent video by the New York Times (NYT) featuring Mr. Li Shengwu, the nephew of former Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong. In a letter to the NYT editor, Singapore’s Ambassador to the US, Mr. Lui Tuck Yew, criticized the video titled ‘How Tyranny Begins’ as an attempt to draw Singapore into misleading analogies about the state of US politics.
Accusations of Misleading Analogies
Mr. Lui pointed out that Mr. Li has never faced exile, jail time, or asset seizures in Singapore, contrary to others featured in the video who had experienced repression in their countries. The video highlighted Mr. Li’s claims about his uncle’s alleged use of police investigations and criminal prosecutions to silence opponents, a statement that drew backlash from Singaporean authorities.
Challenging False Portrayal
While refraining from commenting on US domestic politics, Singapore objected to the video’s false portrayal of the country to further the NYT’s agenda. Mr. Lui emphasized Singapore’s commitment to the rule of law, highlighting Mr. Li’s past legal issues, including a contempt of court charge in 2020. Despite this, Mr. Li remains free to return to Singapore at any time.
Family Feuds and Legal Disputes
The dispute surrounding the Lee family’s home at 38 Oxley Road further complicates the situation. Mr. Lee Hsien Yang and his wife have been embroiled in legal battles over allegations of giving false evidence in judicial proceedings regarding the will of his father, Singapore’s founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew. The government refuted claims of persecution, emphasizing that no one, not even the descendants of Lee Kuan Yew, is above the law.
Differing Perspectives
In response to Mr. Lee Hsien Yang’s accusations against the government and his brother, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, Singapore highlighted the transparent and due process followed in decisions concerning 38 Oxley Road. The government dismissed claims of nepotism and dynastic ambitions, pointing to Mr. Lee Hsien Loong’s voluntary actions, such as selling the house and donating the proceeds to charity.
Legacy and Vendettas
The government questioned Mr. Lee Hsien Yang’s motives, suggesting that his actions stem from personal vendettas rather than genuine concerns. The ongoing feud within the Lee family, extended to an international scale, raises questions about the preservation of Lee Kuan Yew’s legacy and the integrity of Singapore’s political landscape.
In conclusion, the clash between the Lee family members and the Singaporean government underscores the complexities of familial disputes and political legacies. As the saga unfolds, it remains to be seen how these issues will shape the future of Singaporean politics and governance.
